HomeArticlesGetty Images vs AI: A Landmark Copyright Lawsuit

Getty Images vs AI: A Landmark Copyright Lawsuit

Published on

Since the birth of AI, one question has loomed over our heads: Will Artificial Intelligence take our jobs? Now that concern is at the heart of a high-stake battle, between Getty Images and Stability AI.

The two are locked in a high-stakes legal battle in London. This is the first major copyright trial targeting generative AI. The outcome could shape the industry’s future.

The trial kicked off Monday at the British High Court. Getty accused Stability of training its AI image tool, Stable Diffusion, using Getty’s content without permission, violating the copyright law.

getty-images-vs-ai-a-landmark-copyright-lawsuit
Getty Images

Getty Says It’s Theft, Not Innovation

Getty claims Stability copied millions of its copyrighted photos. Their lawyer, Lindsay Lane, told the court this isn’t about tech versus creativity; it’s about respecting ownership.

“This is about enforcing intellectual property rights,” Lane said. She argued that AI companies like Stability want to use creative work without paying for it. Getty supports AI, she added, but not at the cost of creators’ rights.

Getty’s CEO, Craig Peters, has criticised the idea of an “opt-out” model for creators. “Ask permission before using people’s work,” he said.

getty-images-vs-ai-a-landmark-copyright-lawsuit
An illustration from Getty Images’ lawsuit, showing an original photograph and a similar image (complete with Getty Images watermark) generated by Stable Diffusion

Stability Fights Back

Stability’s legal team presented their defence on Tuesday. In their written argument, they said that Getty’s claims threaten their business and the broader AI industry.

They argued that training didn’t happen in the UK, but on Amazon servers in the U.S. They also claimed that only a tiny portion of images generated by Stable Diffusion resemble Getty’s photos.

While stability admitted it uses massive amounts of data to train its models, it denied that this breaks copyright laws.

Big Stakes for AI and Creators

Experts say the judge’s decision may not create new copyright rules. But it could influence future licensing deals between AI developers and content owners.

“This trial is a day of reckoning,” Lane told the court. She accused Stability of grabbing any image, copyrighted, watermarked, or even NSFW, just to rush to market.

If Getty wins, more creators may seek compensation or licensing fees. If Stability wins, AI companies may feel more confident using open web data.

The Bigger Picture

Stability, launched in London, helped develop Stable Diffusion with Runway and German researchers. The company has faced lawsuits, internal turmoil, and criticism over harmful image generation.

Recently, Sean Parker, Napster co-founder, joined its board alongside director James Cameron. Stability raised new funds after founder Emad Mostaque stepped down.

The trial is expected to last three weeks. A written judgment will follow. But no matter the outcome, this case could shape how AI companies and content creators coexist.

Stay tuned to Brandsynario for latest news and updates

Latest articles

Google’s AI Overview Might Just be the Death of Websites, and We’re Partly to Blame

You must have noticed the AI Overviews on your Google search queries. An AI-generated...

“Tumhara Bhai Hai Ya Who Bhi Mar Gaya?” – COMSATS Professor’s Cruel Remark Sparks Outrage

Recently, a video surfaced online from a classroom in COMSATS University. At first, it...

KGTML CEO Khurram Aziz Khan Recently Met With The Pakistan Business Council (PBC) For A Strategic Session

Karachi Gateway Terminal Multipurpose Limited (KGTML) recently held a session with the Pakistan Business...

ChatGPT Launches Study Mode, But it Won’t Write Your Essays!

OpenAI launched ChatGPT in November 2022, which became extremely popular among students with millions...